. . .

We are not complaining, in this place, about a simple problem of discrimination against women in litigation. From this place, we are cautioning the public about a serious situation of maltreatment of women in litigation when these women are mothers. ~Veronique W.

. . .

-

Barry Goldstein Interview 12 Sep 2010

. . .

.......................................In most cases mothers are pathologized or demonized in order to create the appearance of a justification for the extreme actions taken. When the bad decisions backfire in a way that demonstrates even to the courts that the wrong decision was made, the defenders of the courts like to believe these cases constitute the exceptions to the usual good job done by courts. There is now a large body of research about these cases that show there are too many cases with extreme results and flawed practices to be conveniently dismissed as exceptions.” -Barry Goldstein in A Cancer Spreading in the Custody Court System on 16 Sep 2010

. . .

..............................This is another reason why the Battered Mothers Custody Conference is so valuable. At least for that one weekend each year, we are among friends, we can speak the truth, the reality may not be pleasant but at least we can escape the pretend world of the courts and the abusers. It is important for protective mothers to know they are not alone. Other wonderful people are going through the same attacks and being pathologized by unqualified ‘experts.’” -Barry Goldstein in History of the Battered Mothers Custody Conference on 8 Dec 2010

. . .

....... My profile? Intact. Fortunately my own dad was there to stop his fist. ....... Then the courts gave him our baby and finished me off.
PS - To those of you who might think I am nothing but an interfering, critical, histrionic nitwit, let me just say the Supreme Court of Virginia visits my Web site almost every day.

. . .

Yes, Shivani, “sadly Brigitte Deel doesn’t have a facebook.” She has, however, a mother who loves her very much. This is not a secret neighbors at Belmont Country Club should be keeping from her, that is, if she is truly loved by them. I hope the community will lead my daughter to your facebook page.

. . .

A mother won her "greatest fight" by refusing to submit to the judge who tried to abuse her. Click on her video, and as you scroll down my blog, listen for what this non-offending mother told that custody judge who played bully and lost. -Veronique Wyvell

. . .

ADVISORY ... FAIRFAX COURTHOUSE SLAUGHTERHOUSE For Fit Mothers: Virginia judges say a father may hurt the mother of his child, by abusing her, without hurting his chances of gaining custody (mgbb). Judges surveyed for Influences on Judges' Decisions in Child Custody Disputes in the Commonwealth of Virginia further reveal that children over five go to fathers more than they go to mothers when cases go to court (pdf). Pages 4, 6, 7, 20, 21, 23, 24, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 53, 55, and 57 in House Document No. 24, A 2001 Report of The Supreme Court of Virginia Office of The Executive Secretary to The Governor and The General Assembly of Virginia, are especially relevant to the current trend of awarding custody of children to fathers who are abusive, controlling, manipulative, violent men, narcissists, and sociopaths (oes). {According to a 1996 report by the Am. Psychological Assoc., fathers who batter mothers are twice as likely as non-violent men to seek sole custody of children (apa).}

. . .

WARNING ... VIRGINIA COURTHOUSES SLAUGHTERHOUSES For Fit Mothers: In Virginia, rulings by custody judges may result in destitution (even bankruptcy) and childlessness for women who are fit mothers leaving an abusive man and escaping a violent relationship. “Custody transfers to abusive men are rare” and other myths as reported by the American Bar Association Commission on Domestic Violence (ABA Ten Myths, 2006), the Leadership Council on Child Abuse and Interpersonal Violence (LC Six Myths, 2006), and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Family Violence Department (NCJFCJ Seven Myths, 2003) -- though still rumored by the public -- contribute to the butchering of fit mothers everyday by our state bench. All fit mothers hoping to preserve their resources and their parenthoods should understand those misconceptions now officially recognized -- though still rejected by the public -- about the well-studied connection between “intimate partner violence” and “child custody litigation” before entering any courtroom of our Commonwealth of Virginia. If you are a fit mother who was slaughtered by a state judge in a disputed case involving custody of a child you produced with an abusive and violent man, please join your sisters each fall in Richmond for JUDICIAL INTERVIEWS. {I will post 2010 event date, time, place and relevant vitals here by mid November, or parents may contact Mary Kate Felch directly. -Veronique W. on 10.5.10} ALL MAULED MOMS FROM ALL ACROSS VIRGINIA SHOULD PLAN TO BE IN HOUSE ROOM C OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BUILDING IN DOWNTOWN RICHMOND FOR 'JUDICIAL INTERVIEWS OF INCUMBENTS 2010' ON DECEMBER 10 ALL DAY LONG (Starts at 8:30AM). {I will post here the link for the Felch Agenda & Interview Schedule. -V. Wyvell on 10.22.10} SCHEDULE FOR DEC. 2010 'JUDICIAL INTERVIEWS' NOW VIEWABLE BY CLICKING HERE. Your offending judge just might be up for re-appointment this year! Look for that judge's name in this list. If you have something to say about the performances of Judges Bonnie Davis, Gerald Daltan and Esther Wiggins-Lyles, please join your sisters in saying it. Sign up with Mary Kate Felch today! Several aggrieved moms are booked to speak already! MEETING INFO BY CLICKING HERE (Scroll Down to "12/10/10 8:30 a.m.").

A blog made possible by Virginia's chiseling two-bit judiciary


>>>>>>> 2008 SPEECH that took out Judge Finch & 2009 SPEECH that took down Judge Wiggins-Lyles.

>>>>>>>> YOUR VOICE CAN MATTER TOO IN DEC 2010!


>>>> No custody judge in Virginia should expect to get away with behaving like a bully. PERIOD.

>>>>>>>> A Citizen Flyer for mass distribution: HELP PROMOTE JII 2011.

A Washington Post article . . . Judge Go Bye Bye 2009 . . . please read it!

_______
Story by Tom Jackman,
NORTHERN VIRGINIA JUDGE CONFRONTED BY LOCAL MOMS OUSTED

A mother's testimony...took out a Fairfax County circuit judge. The same court had denied her motions to disqualify Zuckerman and remove him from her case.

Va. Judge Selection Process Criticized: Group Challenges Lack of Public Input >>> By Tom Jackman >>> Washington Post Staff Writer >>> Monday, March 2, 2009 >>> www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/01/AR2009030101882.html (www.box.com/s/y2dr45g485e3tm61nn0y)

Our carnivalesque judicial selection process, the clowning around starts here . . .

Our carnivalesque judicial selection process, the clowning around starts here . . .
House Room C of the General Assembly Building in Richmond, on December 10, 2010, in the moments before it would begin to fill eventually to near capacity with concerned citizens from all over Virginia; many came armed with speeches to oppose the re-appointment of incumbent judges to another term for this year’s “Judicial Interviews.” {Missed it Friday? Don’t fret, there’s always next year. Your offending judge just might be up for re-appointment in Dec. of 2011. So look for that judge’s name in this preliminary list (which is subject to change as judges advance to another court, retire, resign, die or are fired because people just like YOU got involved in this effort to remove unfit, corrupt or otherwise disabled judges), and if you see your judge listed, know that it's not too soon for you to begin to prepare for “Judicial Interviews of Incumbents 2011”: Richard Wallerstein, 7/1/2006-6/30/2012; Glenn Clayton, 10/1/2006-9/30/2012; Frank Somerville, 7/1/2006-6/30/2012; James Almand, 2/1/2004-1/31/2012… Continues on Facebook}

A circus, with our GA apt to certify sub-judges, circuit chiefs do a lot of the hiring

…How can this happen? Why do judges in Virginia issue court orders that can make an innocent-enough person feel like the victim of a “hate crime” when some sensibly administered justice would have sufficed? This can happen to people in Virginia because the judicial selection and re-selection process is deformed and has created a judiciary that is inbred which is producing even greater deformity as judicial rulings deteriorate and as judicial respect--for the dignity and the resources of litigants--decline.... ...Furthermore, I have noticed, when a judge advances to another court in mid-term, his or her interview is postponed, that is, delayed by the length of the term associated with that particular court (minus the number of years remaining in the old term): 6 years for district court, 8 for circuit, 8 for appeals and 12 for supreme. With the Judicial Performance Evaluation (JPE) program now cancelled by decision of the 2009 legislative session, “interviews,” known officially as “Judicial Interviews of Incumbents,” is the only screening mechanism in place, acting to protect citizen-consumers of legal services from defective judges. The event is annual and it really is Virginia’s ultimate oversight agency for the judiciary because even “Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission” board members must submit to “interviews.” But, and especially since most members of the general public do not go to “interviews,” it is mostly a “rubber-stamp affair.” Citizens, tragically, are skipping “interviews” because it is such a poorly promoted event, and sitting judges, apparently, are skipping “interviews” because jurists promoted before the end of their term slip through such a poorly designed system for screening them.... Our Carnivalesque Judicial Selection Process, read more, http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/2009/05/referendumtime-dumb-disgusting-outright.html


Click me!
____________________________

FOREWORD by Robin Yeamans, Esq. }find her on facebook

I never refer to a case as "high conflict." When you dig down to the bottom of a case labeled "high conflict," you find domestic violence and abuse. The two sides are not identically culpable. -R.Y.
_______________________________________________________

"If so, what does that relationship look like?" -Eric Holder*

"If so, what does that relationship look like?" -Eric Holder*
*Former judge on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (Photograph clickable)

Commentary "A" by the APA Public Interest Directorate in a 1998 Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force On Violence And The Family on ISSUES AND DILEMMAS IN FAMILY VIOLENCE beginning WHEN PARENTS SEPARATE AFTER AN ABUSIVE RELATIONSHIP, SHOULDN'T FATHERS HAVE AS MUCH RIGHT AS MOTHERS TO BE GRANTED PHYSICAL CUSTODY OF AND VISITATION RIGHTS WITH THEIR CHILDREN? and Commentary "B" by the American Judges Association in a 2002 Court Review Special Issue on DOMESTIC VIOLENCE beginning THE PARENTING OF MEN WHO BATTER

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Focus of January 2011 BMCC VIII will be to connect mothers

Focus of January 2011 BMCC VIII will be to connect mothers
Register online for Dr. Hannah's next conference by going to BatteredMothersCustodyConference.org (Click announcement)

. . .

I personally receive calls, e-mails, and letters from protective mothers all over this country, as well as overseas, begging for help with their cases. The overriding theme is that their abusive ex-partner already has won or is about to "win" custody of their children. Ladies, think this could never happen to YOU? All you need to do is have a biological child with someone who is psychopathic, narcissistic, abusive, or otherwise sick enough to be willing--in his efforts to harm you--to cause massive harm to your child, as well. His task is simple enough; all he has to do is lie and manipulate the court system, making wild claims that you are a "fabricator," "crazy," "addicted," or an "alienator." He can then pay off all the court agents who are willing to do his bidding and take everything he says as the gospel truth, in exchange for his right to exercise power, control, and abuse over you and your kids until they reach majority age. The family court system, as it seems to currently operate, amounts to little more than a black market that gives children and babies to the highest bidder. The ONLY thing keeping this Potemkin village-like fiasco going in our family courts is the secrecy that cloaks the misdeeds. We need a deeply serious and impartial investigation of the family court systems of all 50 states, conducted by authorities with the will and the power to massively reform this corrupt machine. See http://www.batteredmotherscustodyconference.org/ for additional documentation about the family court fiasco. -Dr. Mo Therese Hannah, BMCC Chair and Protective Mothers Advocate, in public comment two years ago, in 2008

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Court appointees make profit by placing children in harm’s way. -Dr. Phil Show

Court appointees make profit by placing children in harm’s way. -Dr. Phil Show
Dr. Phil is now talking about it. If you missed the original airing of “Crisis in Family Court” on 14 April 2010, catch a rerun by checking his website regularly for its list of future shows. (“Crisis in Family Court” was repeated recently on August 14 and August 18; DVDs and transcripts can be ordered at DrPhil.com)

. . .

Dr. Phil is looking for victims of “parental alienation” for an upcoming show: “Victim of Parental Alienation?” (“Do you believe that your ex-spouse, or soon-to-be ex-spouse, is preventing you from seeing your child? Do you believe that your ex is currently committing ‘parental alienation’ by making it very difficult OR preventing you from seeing your son or daughter? If you would like Dr. Phil’s help in mediating this issue and you’re also willing to appear on TV, please e-mail your story.”) Upcoming show topics also include: “Ex-Spouse Causing Your Child To Hate You?” (“Are you separated or recently divorced and you fear that your ex-spouse is alienating you from your child? Have you noticed a negative change in your child’s attitude and behavior towards you? Do you feel that your ex-spouse is the reason why your child is mistreating or ignoring you? If you would like Dr. Phil’s help in mediating this issue and you’re also willing to appear on TV, please e-mail your story.”) and “Who’s Right???” (“Is there a person in your life that blames you for everything? Do you want them to accept responsibility and end this blame game? Is someone in your life not admitting the harm they've caused you? Do they refuse to admit they are wrong? If so and YOU ARE WILLING TO APPEAR ON THE SHOW, tell us your story.”) -VW on 9.7.10

. . .

-

Watch Kathleen Russell on Dr. Phil's "Crisis in Family Court"

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Q: What does the Zuckerman say? A: “Quack! Quack!”

Q: What does the Zuckerman say? A: “Quack! Quack!”
Court appointee William B. Zuckerman, Ph.D., telephoned a leader of the fathers’ rights group in Virginia and offered to help member fathers win custody. DR. ZUCKERMAN DIDN’T KNOW HE WAS TALKING TO MY FRIEND. William B. Zuckerman, Ph.D., never has telephoned a leader of the mothers’ rights movement in Virginia and never has offered to help member mothers gain custody. -Veronique Wyvell (Click pic)

. . .

“Dear Miss: I came across your website when researching Dr. Zuckerman. As you can see from my signature below, I am an attorney. Opposing counsel is attempting to use Zuckerman to assist her client. I believe he is offering terrible advice which is hurting the family more than helping the situation…” ............ -A D.C. lawyer and professor of law at GW, in a spring 2010 message for Miss Veronique Wyvell

. . .

Virginia judges have been forcing parents to watch SPARE THE CHILD since 2000 (video). The Virginia Supreme Court gave Dr. Zuckerman a lead role in the film (letter).

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Sandra Havrilak: She’ll spit on justice even if it means spitting on our children

Sandra Havrilak: She’ll spit on justice even if it means spitting on our children
Find “Support the Disbarment of Sandra Havrilak” on facebook and join the cause. ~Veronique Wyvell {Havrilak lies, Havrilak cheats, Havrilak steals: http://www.box.net/shared/4lv1tb8rz8 for “The Letters 5” (or click image) and http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/2007/12/mark-e-rubin-senior-advisor-to-governor.html for “MARK E. RUBIN SENIOR ADVISOR TO THE GOVERNOR: ‘I can assure you that this information will be considered if Ms. Havrilak’s name comes up…’” (a response from Richmond)}

. . .

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Batterers, Barratry, Bedlam and Boycotts

}THE JUDGE AS BATTERER (NO WONDER THAT, MORE THAN EVER BEFORE, WOMEN IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES EVERYWHERE ARE ON THE RUN, BOLTING WITH THEIR CHILDREN, IN A GLOBAL BACKLASH AGAINST BARRATRY AND A WORLDWIDE BOYCOTT OF THE BENCH): A SAMPLING OF 25 YEARS OF SUPPORTING LITERATURE [Click book cover for an ever growing list of authorities on The Bedlam]

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Family courts, endangering children and punishing women

Family courts, endangering children and punishing women
Order online Dr. Hannah's new collection (with Mr. Goldstein) at CivicResearchInstitute.com

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Mother's Day 2010 at the White House

Peaceful Silent Vigil at The White House in Washington DC on 9 May 2010 Mother’s Day. "A cottage industry of mental health professionals and attorneys with cozy relationships with family court judges routinely bankrupt families with enormous court-ordered fees and often recommend that children be placed with their sexually or physically abusive fathers. Family court judges frequently ignore evidence of abuse, refuse to hear direct testimony from the children, and rubberstamp their cronies’ recommendations. Nurturing mothers are forced to pay costly fees to attend supervised visits with the children they raised, watching helplessly as their children continue to report abuse by their abusers to uncaring visitation monitors. Mothers who speak out about system failure often face judicial retaliation and lose what little time they have with their children. The unregulated cottage industry churns away, generating hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees to experts, while some of the worst cases settle only when the children turn 18. This is a national epidemic that is destroying families across America." (Photograph clickable)

. . .

. . .
See the album at Facebook’s Center for Judicial Excellence: “Justice, Accountability, Children's Safety”

"Stop Court Crimes!"

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Sarah, in the 2005 PBS documentary Virginia is refusing to air*

. . .

*"I'm, like, what kind of a person would take you away from your mom?" ... {Regarding little Sarah’s relegation to “day care”: Custody judges in Virginia routinely strip mostly stay-at-home mothers of their babies, toddlers, preschoolers and young children for commitment to full-time and year-long (summers included) placement in day care centers, that is, institutional care by total strangers, or for confinement with live-in and live-out nannies hired by abusive fathers; my own Brigitte was 2 when Judge Vieregg took her out of “mommy care” and gave her to a working couple and commercial care.} ~Veronique Wyvell~ Or, www.box.com/shared/ij7bvyuu7m

. . .

_______________________________________________________

The Custody Judge, A "Key Abuse Collaborator"

Photobucket

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J U S T I C E . . W A N T E D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . My custody order is incoherent. With one document the judge relies on the report and recommendation of a court appointee and removes and replaces the court appointee, a forensic evaluator (the same Child-Sparing screwball and father-puppet that from a witness stand had barked "She doesn't blink! Most people blink!" in testimony on the impact of my eyelid movements on my mothering skills) refusing for 12 years to let me see my raw psychological test data. I'm seeking an attorney who will agree this circuit ruling is not logical and help me suspend/annul the order. I'm not asking for a trial, just a motion to restore the JDR decision of May 1999, our only true & valid order. Veronique Wyvell (tel 703.748.0072), from February 1999 to Oct. 2015, victim of judicial battery, parental persecution, gang rape, highway robbery and general bullshit in the courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, County of "Fair-facts"

. . .

My incoherent custody order was decided in the wrong court: JUSTICE WANTED PART II. In a formal complaint for the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission, I wrote: Why was my case left to linger in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County? Why did my case not go back to the Fairfax Juvenile & Domestic Relations District Court following entry (date 12/06/2000) of the final order by Judge Vieregg on an appeal from there? Instead, circuit judges allowed subsequent motions and hearings and even a second custody trial all in circuit court, the improper court. Between 2000 and 2004, Deel v. Wyvell passed through the hands of NINE different jurists on the Fairfax circuit bench: Judges Bellows, Havrilak, Keith, Klein, Ney, Roush, Smith, Thacher and Vieregg. All 9 had opportunity but would fail to execute Section 16.1-297 of the Code of Virginia. -V. Wyvell* [Enclosures: Custody Orders dated 07/14/99, 12/06/00, and 11/30/01] *Financial Damages suffered by Veronique Wyvell: $ 53,000.00

. . .

_______________________________________________________

No oversight, no accountability, no justice

No oversight, no accountability, no justice
"Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Arthur B. Vieregg Unimpressed by Testimony of Preacher for United States Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, My Boss the Reverend Dr. George W. Evans" is the title of one of my favorite mommy go bye bye blog postings. Justice Rehnquist attended Sunday services at the church that employed me. He liked our preacher. The preacher liked me. Judge Vieregg, however, didn't care much for either one of us.

. . .

Mothers with a problematic legal case involving Vieregg, the circuit judge, and Zuckerman, the forensic psychologist, should contact me: The evidence has suggested Judge Arthur B. Vieregg and Dr. William B. Zuckerman may have owned real estate together or shared the same residential or mailing address; Vieregg appointed Zuckerman to conduct the Deel/Wyvell custody evaluation. The experience of your Mommy Go Bye Bye blogger has been that these two clowns are nothing more than, and her wish is for readers to take this quite literally, a couple of m----- f------ crooks. (Mr. Vieregg is now with McCammon.)

. . .

. . .
THE IMPORTANT NUMBERS TO JUDGE VIEREGG AND DR. ZUCKERMAN HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MY DAUGHTER’S AGE. Very early in Deel v. Wyvell the question would change from “Where’s the mistake?” to “Who’s making the most mistakes?” Vieregg sat for 3 big trials in 18 mos., in the matter of Brigitte, ages 2-3.

. . .

_______________________________________________________

How do we stop bad judges in Virginia? We start by clicking this poster

How do we stop bad judges in Virginia? We start by clicking this poster
This poster is linked to the community page on Facebook where citizens can retrieve a list naming the judges slated for re-appointment interviews in December 2011 and instructions for signing up to speak to stop the re-appointment of unfit and corrupt judges in Virginia: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Judicial-Interviews-of-Incumbents-2010-Richmond-Virginia/138253656230064. It depicts William B. Zuckerman, Ph.D., clinical psychologist (license no. 0810001150), child custody evaluator and known “paid whore” in the custody courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia. Dr. Zuckerman’s recommendations almost killed my 2-year-old because a judge (Arthur B. Vieregg) followed them. The judge retired in 2007. A FACEBOOK ACCOUNT IS NOT REQUIRED TO ACCESS THE JII COMMUNITY PAGE ON FACEBOOK.

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Name her team and win $100!

[Contest open 9.1.10] WIN $100! I want to offer the first individual who sends me an email containing the name of my daughter’s soccer team (fall 2010) a one hundred dollar bill. Collect your one hundred dollar bill simply by meeting me at her next game. Here she is pictured playing for the Loudoun Tigers All Stars last fall. This message was updated on September 1, 2010, by Veronique Wyvell

. . .

_______________________________________________________

"If you can give up a son, you can give back a daughter." -Miss Wyvell*

"If you can give up a son, you can give back a daughter." -Miss Wyvell*
*Click this photograph for the short story of Deel addiction to hate, jealousy, vengeance, rage, coercive control, manipulation and destruction of families (Next court date in CBOE case is August 19th in Leesburg)

Why won't they let my daughter go?

___________________________________ While in her mid-twenties, Lisa Ferry abandons her baby son in a catholic convent. While in his mid-thirties, Troy Deel abandons his baby son in an adoption scam. They terminate their parental rights to firstborns. Now both in their fifties, Troy and Lisa Deel are obsessed with forcing me out of the life of my child. Why won't they let my daughter go? ~Veronique Wyvell, mother of Brigitte, young victim of lawsuit abuse and foul play in the custody courts of Virginia (or ... The Deels think it’s ok to push custody papers that are not in order … They could be pushing their luck instead)

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Litigation as Psycho-Therapy, Litigation as Murder-Substitute

Litigation as Psycho-Therapy, Litigation as Murder-Substitute
‘WARDING OFF PSYCHIC COLLAPSE’ and ‘HOLDING OFF HATEFUL AND MURDEROUS WISHES’ with CUSTODY WARS: Ethicist and author Michael B. Donner PhD believes, in “tearing the child apart,” lawsuit abusing “parents remain both victim and victimizers in their own internal struggle.” (I believe Dr. Donner is one who “gets it,” and the bad custody judge is one who “looks the other way.” -Veronique Wyvell RN) Photograph clickable

. . .

_______________________________________________________

“The reality is that the ‘Good Dads’ settle these matters amicably.” -CP*

“The reality is that the ‘Good Dads’ settle these matters amicably.” -CP*
*Commentary by Charles Pragnell in “Sociopath Fathers : The ‘Charming’ Killers” ending with “It is to be hoped that society and Courts are able to more easily identify such sociopaths in the future and thereby provide the necessary protections for children and their mothers.” (Photograph clickable)

. . .

_______________________________________________________

A court ruling that contradicts the facts of the case . . .

A court ruling that contradicts the facts of the case . . .
...and recognizes eye-blinking as a relevant measurement of fitness to parent.

. . .

Domestic Violence by Proxy: Why Terrorist Tactics Employed by Batterers Are Not "PAS" ... ~ The Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence 2009 ~

. . .

_______________________________________________________

“troy deel monster”*

“troy deel monster”*
*Search words googled by a visitor of this blog from IP address 75.75.106 on 22 June 2010

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Batterers such as Troy Deel are unlikely to share parenting*

Batterers such as Troy Deel are unlikely to share parenting*
*http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/docs/Truth_Commission_2007.pdf (Page 6/14)

. . .

_______________________________________________________

GOOD DADS DON’T ACT LIKE TROY DEEL

GOOD DADS DON’T ACT LIKE TROY DEEL
Brigitte and Mom on 14 July 2010 at the Rivercrest Swim Meet

. . .

GOOD DADS DON’T ACT LIKE TROY DEEL Haunted by the truth this chronic trespasser on my motherhood says he will sue in email without subject, without substance Email #1 / Email #2 / Email #3 / Email #4 / Email #5 / Email #6 / Attachments, Aunt Dots

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Photo taken by mom, daughter taken by dad

Photo taken by mom, daughter taken by dad
“Brigitte has a mother who loves her very much,” and after six years of separation, I have a daughter who still loves me, much to the dismay of her disturbed father, Troy Deel. ~Veronique Wyvell on 11.11.2010

. . .

_______________________________________________________

An earlier life in pictures from a collection I call "My Pocketbook Album" . . .

An earlier life in pictures from a collection I call "My Pocketbook Album" . . .
…The album I regret was missing from my purse on July 14. It usually travels with me, in my purse, on days I go looking for Brigitte. So, Brigitte, if you are reading, click the picture above of us together for your 6th birthday to see “My Pocketbook Album” in pdf since I goofed up and forgot it when I left the house for Rivercrest that day I finally found you. I have many more photos I want to show you of your early life with your mother who has never, never stopped loving you. ~Posted by Veronique Wyvell on 18 Nov. 2010

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Pretend Phone, Pretend Mommy . . .

Pretend Phone, Pretend Mommy . . .
Troy Deel: “Rest assured, I will not be putting Brigitte in the middle of this in the future.” [Father of Brigitte, in a fax to her mother, Oct. 27, 2003]

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Troy Deel used this device to give his women pleasure . . .

Troy Deel used this device to give his women pleasure . . .
...The night I found him using it for the third time on my 15-month-old was our last together under his roof, yet my preference for iced chocolate milk would make me a pervert. The one food item my pregnant body did not reject by vomiting in eight months of hyperemesis gravidarum (complicated by potentially fatal preeclampsia) was labeled “a fetish” by Dr. William Zuckerman in his custody report. Zuckerman’s report would contain no discussion of the vibrator. See transcript of Deel testimony. -VW (Photograph clickable)

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Mother's savings -- not father's salary -- support baby Brigitte (We lived together) . . .

Mother's savings -- not father's salary -- support baby Brigitte (We lived together) . . .
…Dr. Zuckerman would also skip the subject of money in his $16,444.00 custody evaluation of the Deel-Wyvell (no marriage but we lived together) family. See transcript of Deel testimony. -VW (Image clickable)

. . .

_______________________________________________________

"If you're such a great father, why aren't you taking care of your son?" VW

"If you're such a great father, why aren't you taking care of your son?" VW
{Item #26} “Dr. Zuckerman overlooked the parent/child (often mother/child) separation issues and child abandonment issues which pervaded this case and were fundamental to an understanding of the conflict. The separation and abandonment themes are shockingly rampant in the recent history of this family: Troy Deel’s birthmother’s abandonment of him as a newborn when she left him on a stranger’s porch and their subsequent estrangement; Jackie Decker’s abandonment of her foster son and their subsequent estrangement, her foster son is Troy Deel; Troy Deel’s abandonment of his baby son (by Camen Shimer) and their subsequent estrangement; Carmen Shimer’s “kidnapping” of Troy Deel’s baby son and their subsequent estrangement from Troy Deel; Carmen Shimer’s father’s kidnapping of her from her mother and Carmen’s subsequent estrangement from her father (Carmen was reunited with her mother after 5 years of separation); finally, Lisa Ferry’s (Troy Deel’s current wife) abandonment of her newborn son in a convent after hiding there for the duration of her pregnancy and their subsequent estrangement. Dr. Zuckerman could not have been more negligent in his duty as a trained and experienced psychologist to identify and address unresolved conflict and to stop the monster that so much accumulated resentment has become as evidenced by the father’s obsessive drive to obliterate through litigation the mother (Veronique Wyvell) from their own daughter’s life. After all, the work of psychology is to explore human issues.” Item #26 above and Item #11 below were taken from the “Veronique Wyvell 34-Point/6-Page Official Statement of Heinous Behaviors and Atrocious Actions by Court Appointed Psychological Evaluator William Zuckerman in Troy Deel v. Veronique Wyvell, a Child Custody Evaluation” compiled on February 10, 2002 (and on file with VW). {Item #11} “At the time of the evaluation, Dr. Zuckerman’s daughters were refusing to speak with him because they sided with their mother whom he was divorcing. His troubled personal life should have ethically precluded him from evaluating custody disputes for others.”

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Troy Deel and court reporter scheme to sell Veronique rigged records . . .

Troy Deel and court reporter scheme to sell Veronique rigged records . . .
…Dastardly dad Troy Deel maintains a DOD/DSS Top Secret Level Personnel Security Clearance despite the premise that “[w]hen an individual’s life history shows evidence of unreliability or untrustworthiness, questions arise whether the individual can be relied on and trusted to exercise the responsibility necessary for working in a secure environment where protection of classified information is paramount,” however, clinical psychologist and forensic evaluator William Zuckerman would disregard all of my information and evidence in reference to Deel’s doctored court records by omitting every bit of that information and evidence from his custody report (http://www.dss.mil/disco/ps_faqs.html is source of quoted text). See transcript of Wyvell testimony and Wyvell letter to the head of the Court Reporters Association. -VW

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Troy Deel Sails Under False Colors

Troy Deel Sails Under False Colors
By order of the JDR court, I had full physical custody of Brigitte when Troy Deel registered her at Winwood; he had incomplete legal custody only. It is time for Troy “I’LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET WHAT I WANT!” Deel to stop impersonating ME, Brigitte’s Right and Proper parent since the Fair and Square Judge Carr decision of May 1999, by pushing for all to see custody papers that are not in order, or maybe it is time for Troy “I’LL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET WHAT I WANT!” Deel to start moving to confirm the Incoherent, Unintelligible, Repugnant, and Completely Fraudulent Judge Vieregg decision of Nov. 2001. ~The devoted mother of a young victim of lawsuit abuse & foul play in the custody courts of Virginia~

. . .

_______________________________________________________

He never wanted me to have her. He wanted me to never know her. ~VW

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Batterers, Barratry, Bedlam and Boycotts

}THE JUDGE AS BATTERER (NO WONDER THAT, MORE THAN EVER BEFORE, WOMEN IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES EVERYWHERE ARE ON THE RUN, BOLTING WITH THEIR CHILDREN, IN A GLOBAL BACKLASH AGAINST BARRATRY AND A WORLDWIDE BOYCOTT OF THE BENCH): A SAMPLING OF 25 YEARS OF SUPPORTING LITERATURE [Click book cover for an ever growing list of authorities on The Bedlam]

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Available April 2010

“Women trapped in relationships with abusers come to expect horrendous misbehavior from their partners. What they cannot fathom is the maddening reinforcement commonly provided to abusive men by the justice system and the public at large. . . . That key abuse collaborator is the custody judge. Of all of the actors in a battered woman’s life, none wield more power over her children and financial future. It is beyond infuriating when women discover that their custody judges lack understanding of DV and are colluding with abusers to take away women’s financial resources and, even worse, their children.” --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An excerpt from Why Do Judges Do That? by Judge Mike Brigner --------- in DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, ABUSE, AND CHILD CUSTODY Legal Strategies and Policy Issues by Editors Mo Therese Hannah PhD and Barry Goldstein JD* -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Order Now

. . .

_______________________________________________________

*Family courts, endangering children and punishing women

*Family courts, endangering children and punishing women
Order online Dr. Hannah's new collection by going to CivicResearchInstitute.com (Click image)

. . .

“There is a crisis in the custody court system, which has resulted in thousands of children being sent to live with abusers while safe, protective parents, primarily mothers, are denied any meaningful relationship with their children. The court system has failed to respond appropriately to domestic violence and child abuse cases involving custody. The Commission found many common errors made by the courts and the professionals they rely upon which contribute to these tragedies.”

“The common theme that emerged from the testimony is that there is a widespread problem of abusive parents being granted custody of children and protective parents having their custody limited or denied, and/or being otherwise punished.”

“The situation of family courts endangering children and punishing women must be exposed in the media. State and national policymakers in all three branches of government and other allies must be advised of the problem of family courts placing children in the unsupervised custody of abusive parents, and be told that this is happening with alarming frequency.”

-Dr. Mo Therese Hannah, BMCC Chair and Truth Commission Coordinator, in report findings/solutions four years ago, in 2007

. . .

_______________________________________________________

Remember them in November

Click poster for Marsden Mute (nor did I ever hear back from Senators Howell and Cuccinelli and Delegate Valentine). -Veronique, Mother of Brigitte VIRGINIANS for the REPEAL of the 'BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD' STANDARD

. . .

_______________________________________________________

# # #

-

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

STOCKBROKER/KIDNAPPER LISA DEEL ACCUSED OF MANIPULATION, OBSTRUCTION, NEGLIGENCE, WILLFUL & REPEATED BREACH & ‘A FAILURE TO EXECUTE’ IN 2008 CBOE CASE

...



The French reserve for such people... a special noun...

Garce


[Click photo to watch her video]


SUMMARY8 Stockbroker and Financial Advisor Lisa Ferry Deel of Ashburn and Belmont Country and Golf Club, in Virginia's Loudoun County, is accused of manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach, and “a failure to execute” in a 2008 case before CBOE, or the Chicago Board Options Exchange. Deel is the same woman who 10 years ago began taking away, with intent to abduct, the daughter of the creator of the Mommy Go Bye Bye blog by force and by use of manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach, and “a failure to execute.”

SCOOP8 Lisa Ferry Deel had, among other things, closed the Claimant’s account by making unreasonable demands, and threats, which allowed him to recover less than a third only from his total initial investment records show.

Records also show Ms. Ferry Deel, current wife of Troy Deel, has kidnapped my daughter Brigitte by making use of, yes, manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach, and “a failure to execute,” which is allowing me to recover absolutely nothing from the very exceptional, enviable even, bond of love I once shared with my only child.

While I was building that bond with my newborn, and living with my baby's father, Troy Deel, because I thought it would be nice for Troy to bond with his new daughter too, Miss Lisa Ferry was screwing him.

Speaking of bonds, Mrs. Deel with her husband, who benefits from a top secret government clearance (which didn't stop him from rigging our transcript--the changes to my court record are so glaring that they couldn't have been accidental nor free), blocked Brigitte's uncle, my brother Chris, from recovering his (bail) bond of seven thousand eight hundred sixty two dollars ($7862) then seized, and pocketed, the entire sum for their own personal use only after they watched him invest, and lose, another eight thousand dollars ($8000) in legal proceedings to recover his bond.

Chris Wyvell still waits to see his niece, again, and his bail money.

My brother last saw Brigitte on October 13, 2004. Our father had been cremated that morning. It was Brigitte’s 7th birthday. She was allowed thirty (30) minutes with her uncle because he had agreed to the terms and conditions of the visit demanded and dictated by her stepmother, Lisa Ferry Deel, and her father, Troy Deel: Chris should not speak my name, never mention me, nor refer to me in any way in the presence of Brigitte if he insisted on seeing his niece that day. They met at a McDonald’s in Ashburn. Chris Wyvell kept his promise.

Our father was dying, and the Deels were quietly scheming to take away from us control of the Trust he established for Brigitte. Mr. and Mrs. Deel had intervened to conceal from us the fact that our father was gravely ill and to cut us out of our father’s will. The estate of
Donald Wyvell had been valued at seven hundred thousand dollars ($700,000). Chris and I never saw our inheritance money. And the Trust remains in the improper possession of the Deels.

We, my brother and I, still wait to recover the Trust our father had designated for his only grandchild. There was no marriage, and Troy Deel had never adopted Brigitte.

Speaking of adoptions, money-grubbing schemers and children-haters Lisa Ferry and then-boyfriend Troy Deel entered into an agreement with ex-girlfriend Carmen Shimer that terminated his parental rights to the son Deel and Shimer had together. Ferry and Deel had arranged for the adoption of baby Jeffrey by Shimer's new husband as a means of extinguishing child support obligations, financial and emotional.

While Miss Carmen Shimer was pregnant with Troy Deel’s baby, Miss Lisa Ferry was screwing him. Lisa Ferry and Troy Deel first met and began to date just four years after she had secretly given birth to a son in a catholic convent where she hid from her father for the duration of her own pregnancy. She was in her mid-twenties. In the convent, she terminated her parental rights by giving up the newborn for adoption as a means of extinguishing child support obligations, financial and emotional.

Baby-rejecting child-abductors Deel and girlfriend Ferry (ever-present at transfers, in litigation, and for Zuckerman) took me to court to have me incarcerated, to have me supervised, to have my Mother’s Day weekend eliminated, my summer vacations blocked, my visitation terminated (ask them about 9/11) and my brother robbed. Our newly-wedded Deels even took me to court to have my visits with my toddler confined and restricted to Fair Oaks Mall across the street from their marital home. By her fourth birthday, my little girl, the baby Deel urged me to abort, had endured four different dangerous and debilitating visitation schedules in less than three years. Custody changed three times. Con artists Lisa Ferry Deel and husband, in their litigious and paranoidal rampage, finally took Brigitte. I may one day recover my daughter, but I expect never to recover my one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) which were wasted in those courtroom games that were instigated by these two cons, these two thieves.

Home invaders Ferry & Deel had also burglarized my condo and had taken from it the social security card, the birth certificate, and the passport belonging to my fourteen-month-old, a paternity paper signed by her father, and every picture I owned of me pregnant with Brigitte.

Jeffrey was eleven when his mother died prematurely. I often wonder who cared for him after his loss. I know Deel didn’t. I don’t have information on Ferry's son. Worse off? I doubt it. (The death of Jeffrey's mother is based on unconfirmed information.)

In France, we reserve for special people such as Lisa Ferry Deel a very special noun:

Garce.

-
Veronique Wyvell

“…you may have been shown, or given for your files, custody papers that are not in order.”
-Brigitte’s mother to Belmont Ridge Middle School


*SEQUEL8
Plaintiff v. Lisa Ferry Deel, Katherine M. Owens, and A.G. Edwards; Loudoun County Circuit Court in Virginia; #CL00051880-00; 9/25/08; Status Active

. . .

} A.G. Edwards (and Wachovia Securities) now Wells Fargo Advisors, Employer of Stockbroker-Kidnapper Lisa Ferry Deel }

“Integrity is not a commodity. It’s the most rare and precious of personal attributes. It is the core of a person’s — and a company’s — reputation.” -Dick Kovacevich, Chairman of Wells Fargo & Co.

Wells Fargo Corporate Governance, Executive Officers: Richard M. Kovacevich, Chairman, Wells Fargo & Company; Howard I. Atkins, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Wells Fargo & Company; Patricia R. Callahan, Executive Vice President, Office of Transition (Wells Fargo/Wachovia merger), Wells Fargo & Company; David M. Carroll, Senior Executive Vice President, Wealth, Brokerage & Retirement Services, Wells Fargo & Company; David A. Hoyt, Senior Executive Vice President, Wholesale Banking, Wells Fargo & Company; Richard D. Levy, Executive Vice President, Controller, Wells Fargo & Company; Michael J. Loughlin, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, Wells Fargo & Company; Avid Modjtabai, Executive Vice President, Technology & Operations, Wells Fargo & Company; Mark C. Oman, Senior Executive Vice President, Home and Consumer Finance, Wells Fargo & Company; Kevin A. Rhein, Executive Vice President (Card Services & Consumer Lending), Wells Fargo & Company; James M. Strother, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Wells Fargo & Company; John G. Stumpf, President, Chief Executive Officer, Wells Fargo & Company; Carrie L. Tolstedt, Senior Executive Vice President, Community Banking, Wells Fargo & Company; Julie M. White, Executive Vice President, Director of Human Resources, Wells Fargo & Company.

Wells Fargo Corporate Governance, Board of Directors: John G. Stumpf, President, CEO, Wells Fargo & Company; John D. Baker II, President, CEO, Patriot Transportation Holding, Inc.; John S. Chen, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Sybase, Inc.; Lloyd H. Dean, President, CEO, Catholic Healthcare West; Susan E. Engel, Retired Chairwoman, CEO, Lenox Group Inc.; Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Chairman, CEO, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.; Donald M. James, Chairman, CEO; Richard M. Kovacevich, Chairman, Wells Fargo & Company; Richard D. McCormick, Chairman Emeritus, U S WEST, Inc.; Mackey J. McDonald, Retired Chairman, VF Corporation; Cynthia H. Milligan, Dean Emeritus, College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Nicholas G. Moore, Retired Global Chairman, PricewaterhouseCoopers; Philip J. Quigley, Retired Chairman, President, CEO, Pacific Telesis Group; Donald B. Rice, President, CEO, Agensys, Inc.; Judith M. Runstad, Of Counsel, Foster Pepper PLLC; Stephen W. Sanger, Retired Chairman, General Mills, Inc.; Robert K. Steel, Former President, CEO, Wachovia Corporation; Susan G. Swenson, President and CEO, Sage Software, Inc.

Wells Fargo Local Offices: ASHBURN FARM FINANCIAL CENTER, 43780 PARKHURST PLAZA, ASHBURN, VA 20147 Phone: (703)729-5920 Fax: (703)724-9257; RYAN PARK FINANCIAL CENTER, 43650 YUKON DRIVE, ASHBURN, VA 20147 Phone: (571)223-2287 Fax: (571)223-2995; BROADLANDS FINANCIAL CENTER, 42864 TRURO PARISH DRIVE, ASHBURN, VA 20148 Phone: (703)729-7183 Fax: (571)223-3971; BELMONT GREEN VILLAGE FINANCIAL CENTER, 42995 EASTERN KINGBIRD PLZ, ASHBURN, VA 20147 Phone: (703)729-2118 Fax: (703)729-3107; BROADLANDS FINANCIAL CENTER, 42864 TRURO PARISH DRIVE, ASHBURN, VA 20148; PROSPERITY CENTRE FINANCIAL CENTER, 701- A EAST MARKET ST, LEESBURG, VA 20176 Phone: (703)771-1992 Fax: (703)777-4767; HERNDON JUNCTION FINANCIAL CENTER, 47040 COMMUNITY PLAZA, STERLING, VA 20164 Phone: (703)442-3694 Fax: (703)430-1871; LEESBURG FINANCIAL CENTER, 30 CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE SUITE A, LEESBURG, VA 20175 Phone: (703)777-5353 Fax: (703)771-7380; ELDEN AND ALABAMA FINANCIAL CENTER, 1099 ELDEN ST, HERNDON, VA 20170 Phone: (703)934-1860 Fax: (703)904-7365; HERNDON FINANCIAL CENTER, 1099 ELDEN ST, HERNDON, VA 20170; GRANT AND ELDEN FINANCIAL CENTER, 501 ELDEN ST, HERNDON, VA 20170 Phone: (703)481-2840 Fax: (703)435-2457; EASTGATE MARKETPLACE FINANCIAL CENTER, 25420 EASTERN MARKETPLACE PLZ, SOUTH RIDING, VA 20152; RESTON TOWN CENTER FINANCIAL CENTER, ONE FOUNTAIN SQUARE, 11911 Freedom Drive Suite 100, RESTON, VA 20190 Phone: (703)442-3730 Fax: (703)442-3520; RESTON TOWN CENTER - FINANCIAL CENTER, 11911 FREEDOM DRIVE, SUITE 100, RESTON, VA 20190; RESTON FINANCIAL CENTER, 11842 SUNRISE VALLEY DR, RESTON, VA 20191 Phone: (703)264-2204 Fax: (703)264-2209; HUNTERS WOODS FINANCIAL CENTER, 2264 HUNTERS WOOD PLAZA, RESTON, VA 20191 Phone: (703)758-2260 Fax: (703)860-4137; FOX MILL FINANCIAL CENTER, 2575 JOHN MILTON DR, HERNDON, VA 20171 Phone: (703)264-4016 Fax: (703)264-4017; CHANTILLY CROSSING FINANCIAL CENTER, 14430 CHANTILLY CROSSING LANE, CHANTILLY, VA 20151 Phone: (703)378-5216 Fax: (703)818-2219; SULLY PLAZA FINANCIAL CENTER, 13960 LEE JACKSON MEMORIAL HWY, CHANTILLY, VA 20151 Phone: (703)934-1823 Fax: (703)934-1836; Virginia Coppolino, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Consultant, 21355 Ridgetop Circle, Ste100, Dulles, VA 20166 (703)433-1003 (Office) (571)214-0275 (Mobile) (866)928-2848 (Fax); Raie Paxson, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Consultant, 14430 Chantilly Crossing Ln, Chantilly, VA 20151 (703)502-1372 (Office) (703)927-8118 (Mobile) (866)612-3028 (Fax); Wells Fargo Advisors, 104 Church St SE, Leesburg, VA 20175-3003 (703) 443-6240; Wells Fargo Advisors, 2 Cardinal Park Dr SE, # 202C, Leesburg, VA 20175-4449 (703) 443-1800; Wells Fargo Advisors, 2374 Hunters Woods Plz, Reston, VA 20191 (703) 758-2264; Wells Fargo Advisors, 20 S King St # 100, Leesburg, VA 20175-3024 (703) 777-3804.

Wells Fargo Corporate Offices: 420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104, 1-866-249-3302, BoardCommunications@wellsfargo.com.


Saturday, September 26, 2009

MENTAL HEALTH ABUSE: You may want to get a second opinion before letting that shrink into your family situation...Here’s one free from Jeffrey Schaler

__
States that
a district or circuit court
may order an independent mental health
or psychological evaluation in any case in which
custody or visitation of minor children is at issue.


HB 2545 Child Custody Evaluations
Robert F. McDonnell Patron
Approved
March 2003
___

CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Investigating and Exposing Psychiatric Violations of Human Rights*
...

...
“[M]ental illness is always diagnosed on the basis of some sort of social conflict. When people do something that others find objectionable, they can be diagnosed as mentally ill. If the person doing the diagnosing is more powerful than the person diagnosed, then there is trouble. In this sense, the diagnosis of mental illness is always a weapon…a tool people use against one another especially when there is some kind of power conflict present.” -JS

Dr. Jeffrey Schaler’s incisive speech
on psychiatry upon accepting the Thomas S. Szasz Award at CCHR International's 37th Anniversary and Human Rights Awards Ceremony.

Jeffrey A. Schaler, Ph.D., is a psychologist and professor in the Department of Justice, Law and Society at American University’s School of Public Affairs in Washington, D.C. An expert in legal, social, clinical and public policy matters concerning psychiatry and psychology, Professor Schaler is also the editor of Current Psychology, a journal for diverse perspectives on diverse psychological issues.

Professor Schaler is a frequent guest on national and international television and radio. He has been a featured guest on shows ranging from Voice of America, ABC News 20/20 with John Stossel, CBS 48 Hours, over fifteen times on the late Warren Steibel’s hugely successful PBS series titled DEBATESDEBATES, and National Public Radio.

[SOURCE: www.cchrint.org/videos/experts/schaler/
]
_________________
*MAKING A KILLING is also free. And you may want to get it too before putting your child on that psychotropic drug. -VW

Friday, September 25, 2009

CHECKBOOK CUSTODY in the Commonwealth} Children left out in the cold as coteries of wild judges, lawyers, phds play system for private gain, unchecked

...
________

Every motion, meeting, interview, study, and hearing has been designed ... to make more money for lawyers and consultants. -“Betsy”
__________

My evaluation was conducted by the late Dr. Benjamin Schutz. His estate has not turned over documents despite a court order. I have spoken with Dr. William Zuckerman. He has done follow up on many of Schutz's cases. He wanted $5,000 just to read the file that was never completed.

I spent $17,000 in 10 months of meetings. I was told it would cost another $25,000 to $30,000 to complete testing including $12,000 to take my child to UVA etc.

My ex hid my child from me; lied about jobs, insurance etc.; made false reports to the police about me; slandered me to my family and congregation; and continues to interfere with custody in every way. I needed the materials from the study to defend myself.

I can no longer afford representation. My lawyer wants $10,000 to continue.

This whole process has done nothing for the "welfare of the child."

Every motion, meeting, interview, study, and hearing has been designed to make more money for lawyers and consultants.

I want to do everything I can to help others in this situation.

-“Betsy
NOT TO MOTHERS LIKE US
September 24, 2009

...We are another family that has been a victim, by a gal and psychologist among others. Thanks for what you are doing to help all!
-Proudpawof4@aol.com, Not to Mothers Like Us, 25 Sep 09

. . .
ADDENDA

From: vw
To: "betsy"
Subject: your comment for mgbb...
Date: mon, 28 sep 2009

Hi ... It might help you to meet other former clients of Ben Schutz. I've placed your comment in 'Not to Mothers Like Us' where it will be seen by a representative of the Supreme Court of Virginia. They monitor my blog closely and check that particular post regularly.

You need to be in Richmond this fall for Judicial Interviews. All mothers with cases that have stalled, spiraled out of control, and bumped up against the built-in corruption of our family justice system need to be in Richmond for 'Confront Your Judge'--even if the judges who are hurting them are not up for reappointment.

That's irrelevant.

We need for the OAG to intervene. The GA is our access to the OAG. But the legislature will not take us seriously until they see a large group of aggrieved mothers in House Room C.

They know there's a problem. And they know what the problem is. We won't really need to say much--except maybe 'cut the crap.'

Much power in numbers.

Thanks for writing (glad you kept away from Zuckerman).

~Veronique

Thursday, September 24, 2009

MAULED MOTHERS! Mark your calendars for JII 2009! Whether your offending judge is up for interview this fall or not, be in House Room C on December 17

_______
Senate Notice }

http://dela.state.va.us/Dela/ComOpsStudy.nsf/82965f555b18a72185256c330058a983/D5E14EBF6DD54D818525766A0075A80E?OpenDocument (Retrieved 11.10.09)

http://www.box.net/shared/2q8azlj0fq (Archived)

_______
House Notice }

http://dela.state.va.us/Dela/ComOpsStudy.nsf/82965f555b18a72185256c330058a983/7BBC80E99B0EFE678525766A006E1E6F?OpenDocument (Retrieved 11.10.09)

http://www.box.net/shared/nl65yknedj (Archived)

_______
Schedule for Interviews of Incumbent Judges, Judges Pro Tempore and Substitute Judges }

http://leg1.state.va.us/091/oth/Judges.Interviews.121709.pdf (Retrieved 11.24.09)

http://www.box.net/shared/g4ixfnkbij
(Archived)

NOTE: Schedule subject to change! Contact Mary Kate Felch to confirm the schedule and to sign up to confront a judge. Any member of the public who wishes to speak against the appointment or re-appointment of a specific judge must contact Ms. Felch in advance to be added to the schedule. She can be reached by calling 804.786.3591 or sending mail to MFelch@leg.state.va.us and MFelch@dls.virginia.gov. Felch's office is on the 2nd floor of the General Assembly Building.

"...Unless anyone comes to complain, the judges usually get re-appointed," said COJ chairman Delegate Dave Albo on November 12, 2008.



Related Links . . .

Monday, September 28, 2009
!MOTHERS WHOSE CASES HAVE STALLED, spiraled out of control and bumped up against the built-in corruption of our family justice system, CYJ is for you!
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2009/09/mothers-whose-cases-have-stalled.html

Sunday, July 5, 2009
Dear aggrieved mothers: Join the campaign...
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2009/07/dear-aggrieved-mothers-join-campaign.html

Monday, March 30, 2009
CONFRONT YOUR JUDGE AT JUDICIAL INTERVIEWS OF 2009. COJ SAYS UNLESS ANYONE COMES TO COMPLAIN, JUDGES USUALLY GET REAPPOINTED. SO WHO'S UP THIS FALL???
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2009/03/confront-your-judge-at-judicial.html

Friday, December 12, 2008
‘HARING AND HAYWARD’ THE REASONABLE VOICES OF TWO FIT-LOVING-NONOFFENDING MOTHERS URGE GA TO DEBENCH JUDGES WHO FAIL TO APPLY THE LAW Finch Under Fire
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2008/12/haring-and-hayward-reasonable-voices-of.html


Monday, November 3, 2008
*December 11* is MOTHERS-PUT-THRU-THE-GARBAGE-DISPOSER-BY-WAYWARD-JUDGES-OF-THE-COMMONWEALTH-OF-VIRGINIA *AWARENESS DAY* ... Meetup in GA Building
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2008/11/1211-mothers-pushed-thru-garbage.html


Wednesday, September 3, 2008
NOT TO MOTHERS LIKE US
http://mommygobyebye-
virginia.blogspot.com/2008/09/not-to-mothers-like-us.html


[This post was originally published on 11 November 2009]

Judge Arthur Vieregg Unimpressed by Testimony of Preacher for U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist, My Boss the Rev. Dr. George W. Evans

__________________________
...
The pastor the judge discounted
a letter to the chief*
...

This brochure is also available in pdf for better viewing
_______


*This letter is also available in pdf for easier reading
_______

This brochure is also available in pdf for better viewing
_______


*This letter is also available in pdf for easier reading
_______

This photo is also available in pdf for better viewing
_______

*This letter is also available in pdf for easier reading
_______

www.redeemermclean.org

http://redeemermclean.org/preschool/index.php

Lutheran Church of the Redeemer

1545 Chain Bridge Road

McLean, VA 22101

703.356.3346

church@redeemermclean.org

AUWCL Paper Warns About Unregulated Authority/‘ABUSE AND DISCRETION: EVALUATING JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN CUSTODY CASES INVOLVING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN’

_______
“This Article [by Dana Harrington Conner*] is an exploration of the history and creation of the broad power of the custody trial judge, the unsatisfactory standards applied in custody cases involving violence against women, and our system’s inability to adequately review flawed decisions at the appellate level.” (P164)



“Unregulated authority”

EXTRACT: Due to the great deference afforded to the custody trial judge, these particular judges enjoy a position of authority over decision-making unseen in other types of cases. As a result, family law cases are infrequently appealed and have an extremely low reversal rate at the appellate court level. Legal scholars Sylvia A. Law and Patricia Hennessey maintain that, by its very nature, the best interest standard vests a high degree of discretion in trial judges, who are “effectively unreviewable on appeal.” The best interest factors are open to interpretation and allow the trial judge the ability to weigh each factor in accordance with his or her own personal conscience. What one judge believes to be right or wrong under the circumstances is likely to be very different from what another judge or lawyer will find appropriate. Law and Hennessey suggest that this “unfettered discretion permits judges (usually older, white males) to incorporate their own personal history, experience and bias in adding content to the ‘best interest’ principles,” and, because the factors involve the subjective observations of the trial court judge, the reviewing court has no objective way to find error, absent flagrant abuse.

SOURCE: Abuse and Discretion: Evaluating Judicial Discretion in Custody Cases Involving Violence Against Women in the Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, Vol. 17:2, a 2009 publication of the Washington College of Law which is affiliated with American University in Washington DC

The complete paper can be found at:
http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=dana_harrington_conner


*
Professor Dana Harrington Conner
(tel 302.477.2161 and email dlharringtonconner@widener.edu
) teaches in the areas of domestic violence, violence against women, and professional responsibility at Widener University School of Law. She is the current director of the Delaware Civil Clinic (DCC), supervising law students admitted to the limited practice of law. The primary focus of the DCC is the representation of survivors of domestic violence. Early in her legal career… continued

[This post was originally published on 20 October 2009]

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

HOW I BECAME AN OPPORTUNITY (new post) AND WHY YOU CAN TOO, THAT IS, IF DIVORCE LAWYER & GOP SEN. KEN CUCCINELLI BECOMES AN ATTY. GENERAL OF VA. IN 09

__________
"New post" found here, but you may first want to read the following:

Mr. Cuccinelli, the divorce lawyer, is pro-Zuckerman.

Mr. Cuccinelli, the state senator, is running for attorney general in 2009.

Your vote for Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II (R) this November is a vote in favor of perpetuating bedlam in family courtrooms all over our beautiful state.

So please, if you care about kids, choose with care in November because your support and election of divorce lawyer and republican senator Ken Cuccinelli for the job of Attorney General of Virginia will increase consumer exposure to public corruption,

not decrease it.*

*Did you know that Senator Cuccinelli
has even pushed for a return to ‘fault’ divorce in Virginia
when the research shows that, after states adopt ‘no-fault’ divorce,

fewer women commit suicide
and
domestic violence drops sharply
?

He has also sponsored a law designed
to encourage contact between a perpetrator of family abuse,
when the perpetrator is restrained by a protective order,
and the child, or the children, of the perpetrator;

did you know that?


__________
Posted by Veronique Wyvell
Survivor of Judicial Rape
Fairfax County, Virginia

...this fall and every fall

Saturday, September 5, 2009

ZEROING IN ON ZUCKERMAN: Master insinuator is star in message to Citizens Commission on Human Rights, watchdog group investigating mental health abuse

______________
_______
My name is Jenny Lindamood and I work for the Citizens Commission on Human Rights in Washington, D.C. Our international office in Los Angeles contacted me to let me know you had been sent a CCHR Making a Killing Kit. I am writing to you to ensure you have received this. If so, I would appreciate any feedback you can give me regarding the materials. What do you think of them? Are you planning on sharing the information you saw with your colleagues or friends? If you have not received it yet, please let me know as soon as possible so I can make sure to get it to you. Please feel free to ask me any questions you may have as well. I look forward to hearing from you.
-JL of CCHR in DC (tel 202-667-0206) on 2 October 2009

_______
On 27 October 2009, Veronique Wyvell wrote:

Hi Jenny ... This is Veronique, Xxxxx's girlfriend. You spoke with Xxxxx recently.

I just want to add that not only did we receive "Making a Killing," yesterday "Psychiatry: Industry of Death" arrived in the mail. I had just put down your excellent Documentary Supplement when a friend dropped in. I sent her home with my copy of the Making a Killing dvd and promised her the Industry of Death dvd the next time she comes by. You are doing such good work on this issue. We are grateful. And you can count on me to spread the word.

By "we" I mean the many fit, loving, non-offending mothers who are the victims of litigation abuse, and foul play, after leaving violent and controlling men. The abusive fathers of our children are gaining custody of them at an alarming rate in America today, WHEN CASES GO TO COURT. Too often court-connected, or court-appointed, psychologists can be blamed for this. They lie. They cheat. They are without conscience and offer themselves -- their testimony -- to the highest bidder. These are "You Pay I Say" specialists who could care less about how many lives they damage and destroy by exploiting parents in post-separation, child custody disputes that go to court.

In 2001, a judge told me that unless I could present the court with a "Treatment Plan," I could not exercise my 2 weeks of summer vacation visitation with my 5-year-old. I had been misdiagnosed by child custody evaluator William B. Zuckerman PhD, of Burke, Virginia, who successfully (and deceitfully) persuaded the court I was unstable, that a "Treatment Plan" was required. Long story short, I have not seen my daughter (who was given to her abusive father) in many years because of this impostor Zuckerman. Zuckerman collected more than $16,000.00 for contributing nothing more than a bunch of "junk science" to our legal case.

The friend who left my home yesterday is also a victim of Dr. Zuckerman. Her visits with her young daughter have been "supervised" for the last several years because Zuckerman had also maliciously labeled her with mental problems.

I know of a dozen mothers wrongfully "diagnosed" by this worthless defrauder, and swindler.

Psychologists and psychiatrists need to be removed from family courtrooms immediately; they cause more problems than they solve.

In one of your many videos (I'm still working on seeing each and every one of them), I heard how psychiatry has invaded, or is invading, every facet of our life. I know from personal experience that the field has created a very comfortable niche for itself in the family courtrooms of the Commonwealth of Virginia. I do what I can to expose this truth with a blog I call "Mommy Go Bye Bye," found at http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/. There you can even find the video of Dr. Jeffrey Schaler's acceptance speech that discusses the use of mental health diagnoses as "weapons," and "tools" for control.

This is ever so true in child custody litigation when family abuse is a factor.

~Veronique Wyvell, RN

_______
On 27 October 2009, Danielle wrote:

I am writing to follow up regarding the Free Information Kit that you requested. I would greatly appreciate your answers to a few short questions. 1) Have you received your Kit yet? 2) If so, have you watched the documentary, Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging"? 3) Have you shared the documentary with your family, friends or associates? I am very interested in knowing your thoughts. Please e-mail me.
-Danielle of CCHR International in Los Angeles (tel 323-467-4242)

_______
On 28 October 2009, Veronique Wyvell wrote:

Hello Danielle ... I've just forwarded to you the message I sent Jenny in your Washington DC offices. I wrote Jenny yesterday to confirm receipt of both dvds and to thank her for those and all of this remarkable effort cchr is dedicating to mental health abuses that, yes, have “gotten into every facet of our life.” My own family is affected as you will read in the email for Jenny. I think that email should answer all of your questions. So sorry for the delay in getting back with you!

[This post was originally published on 30 October 2009]

WILLIAM ZUCKERMAN PHD, FRAUDSTER: A case for the OAG and a case study in harassment, unnecessary delay and needless increase in the cost of litigation

______________
In the Matter of William B. Zuckerman, PhD, Fraudster

a message for the office of the attorney general


From: [Veronique Wyvell RN]
To: dclementson@oag.state.va.us
Subject: Re: Statement of Attorney General on Muhammad Execution
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009
Attachments: Attorney General McDonnell & Wyvell open house 2007, Emery paper 2005, Wyvell teacher 2002


16 November 2009
______
Attention: David E. Clementson
c/o William C. Mims
Attorney General of Virginia
900 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219

____________
Dear Mr. Clementson ... With all due respect, when will some consideration be given to the number of "loved ones lost and lives shattered" by William B. Zuckerman
, Ph.D. in Burke, Virginia?

After I received two more back-to-back calls recently from individuals he victimized, I contacted a local attorney to inquire about class action against him. Years ago, in 2002, I wrote the Office of the Attorney General of Virginia to say that Dr. Zuckerman was defective and dangerous and should not be consulted by judges and lawyers during child custody litigation. Mr. Howard Casway answered my letter. He directed me to the Virginia psychology board. I have filed complaint forms with the Virginia Board of Psychology, the American Psychological Association and even the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights. I have tried a Warrant in Detinue in Fairfax County General District Court, a Tort claim in Fairfax County Circuit Court and even an appeal in the Supreme Court of Virginia. And do you know that all I am asking for is to see and copy my complete mental health file? Dr. Zuckerman has withheld those records from me since December of 2000 when I first began to request them, in writing always.

[ Specifically, Dr. Zuckerman is withholding the automated Caldwell “Interpretive Report” for the MCMI-3 and the automated Caldwell “Narrative Report” for the MMPI-2. ]

I owe him no money. So what exactly is the problem with this man?

Dr. Zuckerman's detention of my mental/medical health information has cost me eight (8) summer vacation visitations with my daughter. She was three-years-old (3) when we last vacationed together. She is now twelve (12).

Our court order wants Brigitte Veronique Deel to spend fourteen (14) consecutive days with her mother, each summer. But nobody with the power to help her do just that wants her to.

One therapist, a Dr. Stanton Samenow, refused to help me collect my records from Dr. Zuckerman; he was not interested in them, he said. Another therapist, a Dr. Joseph Novello, never replied to my letter which asked for his help in collecting my records from Dr. Zuckerman.

Doctors Samenow and Novello, like Dr. Zuckerman, are very well-known in the courts of Northern Virginia. How do they dare to treat citizens in this way.

Can you begin to imagine just how much money my family members and I have lost to their shenanigans, their charlatanry? Let me help you: approximately $80,000.00.

My lawyer even refused to file a motion to help me recover my records.

So, Mr. Clementson, what does our Commonwealth of Virginia gain, exactly, from putting fit, loving, non-offending parents like me through such an ordeal?

I was teaching pre-school (see photo attached -- a boy sits on my lap), a class of three-year-olds (3), when Muhammad and Malvo began their shooting spree. At the time, I was also in the midst of the difficulties I describe above. I was feeling doubly terrorized in 2002. Muhammad and Malvo were on the loose -- our students were even kept inside for recess to keep them safe from bullets -- and I had shared three (3) forty-eight-hour (48) weekends only with my four-year-old (4) in the entire summer of 2002, which had just ended when their shooting spree started. My daughter Brigitte and I were together for a total of six (6) days out of the entire summer of 2002.

I saw her in July of 2004 and not again since.

Dr. Zuckerman is wholly to blame for this current state of extreme maternal deprivation of five plus (5+) years’ duration for one Brigitte Veronique Deel.

Your Dr. Zuckerman is my own personal terrorist.

Because my personal terrorist is still on the loose, my life of terror did not end with the execution of John Allen Muhammad last Tuesday night.

Because not one soul, not even an OAG rep, with the power to properly deal with William B. Zuckerman cares to do so, the burden becomes mine to organize and initiate a proper class action lawsuit against this fraudster. I am, quite frankly, not feeling too terribly enthusiastic about it -- this is not because I believe such a suit is un-winnable, this is because that burden should be yours, not mine.

The OAG would not be wasting its time.

I can assure you that the number of Virginia citizens hurt by Zuckerman is near-equal to the number of Virginia citizens hurt by Muhammad. I read below of his sixteen (16) victims.

Here is my list so far of Zuckerman's fourteen (14):

1 ~ [S.B.]
2 ~ [C.B.]
3 ~ [P.D.]
4 ~ [V.D.]
5 ~ [E.G.]
6 ~ [E.H.]
7 ~ [J.H.]
8 ~ [R.K.]
9 ~ [A.D.]
10 ~ [S.P.]
11 ~ [W.W.]
12 ~ [V.W.]
13 ~ [T.Y.]
14 ~ [J.D.]

[ Names are abbreviated for privacy. ]

I caught up with our newly elected governor, Bob McDonnell (see photo attached -- the ponytail belongs to me), one summer at the Alexandria home of Chris Braunlich who was running for School Board At-Large at the time. The Braunlichs were hosting an Open House in their backyard. Mr. McDonnell was still our attorney general then. We discussed Dr. William B. Zuckerman. I handed Attorney General Robert McDonnell a copy of an excellent paper authored by UVA's Robert Emery (see photo attached -- look for the little girl with the sad face) about people like Zuckerman. A friend and fellow victim, Wei Wilson, was at my side. Mr. McDonnell's community outreach coordinator, Juanita Balenger, was at his side. Ms. Balenger took the Emery paper from Mr. McDonnell, and they both promised us a follow-up call. The month was August, the year 2007. Ms. Wilson and I were never contacted, by phone or otherwise.

You see, Mr. McDonnell, as delegate, had recently, and successfully, sponsored legislation that broadened the use of child custody evaluations/evaluators in disputed cases.

I have an extra copy of the Emery document, if you would like it. Or you can find the entire publication online.

Not only is it time for child custody evaluator Dr. Zuckerman "to go," very serious consideration should be given, immediately, to an outright moratorium on child custody evaluations in Virginia.

Respectfully yours,

Veronique Wyvell, RN*
7831 Enola Street, #TA7
McLean, Virginia 22102
703.748.0072


*HOW I BECAME AN OPPORTUNITY

____________________________

From: Clementson, David E., DClementson@oag.state.va.us
To: "Clementson, David E."
Subject: Statement of Attorney General on Muhammad Execution
Date: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:10 PM


COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Office of the Attorney General
Richmond, VA 23219


William C. Mims, Attorney General
900 East Main St., Richmond, VA 23219, 804-786-2071

For Immediate Release

Contact:
David Clementson, 804-692-0552

Statement of Attorney General on Muhammad Execution

RICHMOND – Virginia Attorney General Bill Mims tonight released the following statement on the execution of John Allen Muhammad:

“Tonight, John Allen Muhammad was executed by the Commonwealth of Virginia for his role in a killing spree that shocked our nation. Families of Virginia were held hostage in their homes, fearing they would be the next victim of a sniper’s bullet. Muhammad was executed for the murder of Dean Meyers, who was shot and killed while fueling his car at a gas station in Manassas. Meyers was one of 10 people murdered, with six additional victims shot, across four states and Washington, D.C., during 47 days of terror by Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo. The murder of Meyers was the 12th in the string of 16 shootings. A jury convicted Muhammad of the premeditated capital murder of Meyers in the commission of an act of terrorism, and the premeditated capital murder of Meyers within three years of the premeditated murders of other persons. The jury sentenced him to death for those crimes.

“While nothing can bring back the loved ones lost and lives shattered, tonight justice was served to the fullest extent of the law. Muhammad’s acts seven years ago remain particularly vivid in our minds today.

“Muhammad’s death penalty was exhaustively reviewed and affirmed by the trial court, Virginia Supreme Court, U.S. District Court, U.S. Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court, and the Governor has declined to intervene. Our thoughts and prayers remain with the surviving victims and their families and friends, and with the families and friends of the 10 innocent victims slain by Muhammad during the unprecedented time of terror in the fall of 2002.”

# # #

Attorney General McDonnell & Wyvell (ponytail) Open House Aug 2007
evaluators or violators?
______________


University of Virginia Dr. Robert Emery Paper Jul 2005
speculative, irrelevant, inflammatory
______________


Miss Wyvell Pre-School Teacher Redeemer Lutheran Church 2002
the pastor the judge discounted
______________

[This post was first published on 19 November 2009]

HEY ABUSIVE FATHERS! Lookin' for the best PARENTECTOMY FACILITATOR, the best PSYCHOLOGICAL SURGEON and the best PARENTAL ALIENATOR in Va.? Let me help

_____________________

William B. Zuckerman, Ph.D., telephoned a leader of the fathers’ rights group in Virginia and offered to help member fathers win custody.

Dr. Zuckerman didn’t know he was talking to my friend.



William B. Zuckerman, Ph.D., never has telephoned a leader of the mothers’ rights movement in Virginia and never has offered to help member mothers gain custody.

-VW*

_________

*ATTENTION ABUSIVE FATHERS:


Looking for the best “parentectomy facilitator,” the best “psychological surgeon” and the best “parental alienator” in Virginia?

Let me refer you.

Visit
http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/2009/09/william-zuckerman-phd-fraudster-case.html,

For
WILLIAM ZUCKERMAN PHD, FRAUDSTER: A case for the OAG and a case study in harassment, unnecessary delay and needless increase in the cost of litigation.

-VW*

_______

*Any fit, loving, non-offending mother opposite an abuser in Virginia is a potential victim of fraudster William Zuckerman, Ph.D., so, dear mothers, protect yourselves by becoming informed -- by becoming court/street smart -- because Zuckerman will teach you nothing and exploit your naïveté, betray your trust, even ridicule you (for example, Zuckerman might report that you "bark" at the father, or Zuckerman might, in his report, describe the one food item your pregnant body did not reject by vomiting as "a fetish"), and the courts worship Zuckerman (for example, the Virginia Supreme Court gave Zuckerman a lead role in its film "Spare the Child" \ WATCH VIDEO CLIP), which means that Zuckerman, like your abusive ex, will “get away with everything” as you find yourselves losing everything, especially your children. More at Bill Zuckerman backstabbing billing strategy...

Some reading I always like to recommend:

CHILD CUSTODY JUSTICE
By Lundy Bancroft (2008)
http://www.lundybancroft.com/child.html


!!! Be sure and read all 10 sections of Mr. Bancroft's article...
>Introduction
>Misconceptions About the Family Courts
>How Family Courts Handle Domestic Abuse Allegations
>Dealing with a Custody Evaluator
>When You Have Concerns About Child Sexual Abuse
>Should I Involve Child Protective Services?
>Negotiating With an Abuser
>What Can I Do?
>Building a Broad-Based Movement for Family Justice
>The Protective Mothers Alliance

HOW PERSONALITY DISORDERS DRIVE FAMILY COURT LITIGATION
By William Eddy (2007)
http://www.highconflictinstitute.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=77&Itemid=101

BMCC IV TRUTH COMMISSION REPORT
By Mo Hannah (2007)
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/docs/Truth_Commission_2007.pdf

10 MYTHS ABOUT CUSTODY AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND HOW TO COUNTER THEM
By The American Bar Association (2006)
http://www.abanet.org/domviol/custody_myths.pdf

MYTHS THAT PLACE CHILDREN AT RISK DURING CUSTODY LITIGATION
By S. J. Dallam and J. L. Silberg (2006) http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/cust_myths.html

TEARING THE CHILD APART: THE CONTRIBUTION OF NARCISSISM, ENVY, AND PERVERSE MODES OF THOUGHT TO CHILD CUSTODY WARS
By Michael B. Donner (2006)
http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/2009/08/michael-donner-phd-pathological-envy.html


PARENTECTOMY IN THE CROSSFIRE
By Collette Summers and David Summers (2006)
http://www.pact-online.org/pdf/Parentectomy_in_the_Crossfire.pdf

UNADULTERATED ARROGANCE: AUTOPSY OF THE NARCISSISTIC PARENTAL ALIENATOR
By David Summers and Collette Summers (2006)
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a756831094~db=all

SPLITTING: PROTECTING YOURSELF WHILE DIVORCING A BORDERLINE OR NARCISSIST
By William Eddy (2004)
http://www.highconflictinstitute.com/store/proddetail.php?prod=SPLIT

COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS IN ADDRESSING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES
By Peter Jaffe, Claire Crooks and Samantha Poisson (2003)http://www.ncjfcj.org/images/stories/dept/fvd/pdf/journal_4_fall_03_misconceptions.pdf

IMPEDING RECOVERY: THE BATTERER IN CUSTODY AND VISITATION (Ch. 5 in THE BATTERER AS PARENT)
By Lundy Bancroft and Jay Silverman (2002)
http://www.abuseofpower.info/Bancroft_BattererParent.pdf

PARENTAL ALIENATION AND ENMESHMENT ISSUES IN CHILD CUSTODY CASES
By Daniel J. Rybicki (2001)
http://www.danielrybicki.com/PAS.html


UNDERSTANDING THE BATTERER IN CUSTODY AND VISITATION DISPUTES
By Lundy Bancroft (1998)
http://lundybancroft.com/art_custody_visitation.html


CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE: PROTECTING THE CHILDREN OF HIGH-CONFLICT DIVORCE
By Carla Garrity and Mitchell Baris (1994)

http://www.webheights.net/dividedheart/garrity/cm.htm


PREVENTING PARENTECTOMY FOLLOWING DIVORCE
By Frank S. Williams (1990)
http://fact.on.ca/Info/pas/willia90.htm


BREAKING THE SILENCE: CHILDREN'S STORIES
By Tatge/Lasseur for PBS (2005)
http://mommygobyebye-virginia.blogspot.com/2009/03/movietime-at-least-44-states-have-aired.html




**********************************************************
“…we note that there is a fair amount of controversy in the field regarding the conclusion that more mothers alienate than fathers, and wish to emphasize that in many cases we personally have seen, it is the father who alienates and the mother who is the target.”

[SOURCE: http://www.pace411.com/newsletter9.html
]
**********************************************************

SKIMPING ON SCIENCE |Read before you embark on that custody evaluation: Psychologists say clinical techniques largely reflect own insights, experience

_______
Many psychotherapists openly state that scientific research is largely irrelevant to their practice. Most say that their clinical techniques largely reflect their own insights and experience; they tend not to use the most effective types of treatments available; and they admit to little in the way of scientific training. -The Post on Sunday, November 15, 2009*



“Clinical psychologists’ failure to achieve a more significant impact on clinical and public health may be traced to their deep ambivalence about the role of science and their lack of adequate science training, which leads them to value personal clinical experience over research evidence, use assessment practices that have dubious psychometric support, and not use the interventions for which there is the strongest evidence of efficacy.”

[ SOURCE: APS Psychological Science in the Public Interest / Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care / By Timothy B. Baker, Richard M. McFall, and Varda Shoham / Vol. 9, No. 2, Oct. 2009 / PDF / Summary ]

_______
*Washington Post
Is your therapist a little behind the times?
November 15, 2009
by Timothy Baker, Richard McFall, and Varda Shoham
The practice of clinical psychology — which includes psychotherapy — is akin to medicine as it was practiced a century ago…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/13/AR2009111302221.html

888 More media coverage of “Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology” by Baker, McFall and Shoham 888

The Daily Page
Prof renews psychology controversy
November 5, 2009
by Josh Wimmer
Timothy Baker has a problem with psychology today. He thinks it bears a dangerous resemblance to the medicine of yesteryear: anecdotal, unscientific, as likely to hurt as help...
http://www.isthmus.com/isthmus/article.php?article=27345

Nature
Psychology: a reality check
October 15, 2009
by Allison Abbott
Anyone reading Sigmund Freud's original works might well be seduced by the beauty of his prose, the elegance of his arguments and the acuity of his intuition…
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7266/full/461847a.html

Psychology Today
How Deep is the Divide between Therapy and Science?
October 9, 2009
by Michael Steger
Is there a Mackenzie Phillips-sized family secret lurking in the heart of psychology?...
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-meaning-in-life/200910/how-deep-is-the-divide-between-therapy-and-science

Los Angeles Times
Do therapists know what they're doing? Don't bank on it, 3 psychologists say
October 8, 2009
by Rosie Mestel
When we're battling psychological problems and go see a therapist for treatment, we tend to trust that it's doing us good. But should we?...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/booster_shots/2009/10/do-therapists-know-what-theyre-doing-dont-bank-on-it-three-psychologists-say.html

Nature.com
Quote of the Day
October 5, 2009
by Walter Mischel
“The disconnect between what clinicians do and what science has discovered is an unconscionable embarrassment. [There is a] widening gulf between clinical practice and science.”
http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/10/quotes_of_the_day_22.html

Science Magazine
Shrinking the Shrinks
October 2, 2009
by Constance Holden
Many training programs for clinical psychologists in the United States should be scrapped, an organization of psychologists says...
http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/Science_Mag_coverage.pdf

The Chronicle of Higher Education
Report Calls for Added Science in Psychology Ph.D. Programs
October 2, 2009
by Simmi Aujla
A group of psychologists is proposing a new accreditation system for graduate psychology programs that offer Ph.D.'s, saying such programs should emphasize scientific training more than the current system does...
http://chronicle.com/article/Report-Calls-for-Increased/48697/

Newsweek
Ignoring the Evidence: Why do psychologists reject science?
October 2, 2009
by Sharon Begley
It's a good thing couches are too heavy to throw, because the fight brewing among therapists is getting ugly...
http://www.newsweek.com/id/216506



If clinical psychology in the United States wants
to remain viable and relevant in today's health systems,
it needs to publicly embrace science.


[This post was originally published on 28 Nov 2009]

U.S. SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE FATE OF CHILD MANHANDLED IN CUSTODY CASE RIFE WITH JUDICIAL MISMANAGEMENT AND MISCONDUCT IGNORED BY VIRGINIA'S 7 JUSTICES

_____________________
P R E A M B L E } “The conference identified mental health professionals, lawyers and judges as those having the greatest power to influence the conduct of high-conflict custody cases and concluded that they should bear the primary responsibility for preventing or reducing conflict in high-conflict cases. High-conflict custody cases need a specialized approach. Judges, lawyers and mental health professionals should have special training in handling high-conflict cases. They must develop ways to work together under new collaborative models to more effectively identify and resolve high-conflict custody cases … These new models should hold all the participants in custody cases accountable for their contribution to increasing or decreasing levels of conflict, be sensitive to the rights and privacy of individuals and be prepared to intervene to the extent necessary to protect children.”

[ SOURCE: ‘High-Conflict Custody Cases: Reforming the System for Children,’ a report of the American Bar Association 2000 Wingspread Conference on Child Custody Proceedings Reform,
http://www.abanet.org/child/custody-proceeding-reform.pdf ]

The United States Supreme Court last month was requested to intervene by a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the matter of Ariana-Leilani, a little girl separated from a protective parent and forced to live with an abusive one, in an appeal from the Supreme Court of Virginia.*

Since June 2008, pro-se litigant Dr. Ariel King’s parental rights, including her right of contact with her now six-year-old daughter, were effectively terminated by a “final” “custody order” by the Juvenile and Domestic Relations (JDR) Court in Arlington, Virginia -- a court “not of record.” The JDR Court entered a series of orders making an appellate review, including a statutorily provided de novo review by the Circuit Court, inaccessible.**
[ SOURCE: ‘Writ of Certiorari,’ a petition in the United States Supreme Court in the case of Ariel King v. Michael Pfeiffer, http://www.box.net/shared/d0oxfvlk6v ]

Questions presented to the U.S. Supreme Court justices are these:

1) Is it a denial of pro-se litigant parent’s due process and equal protection rights to be denied substantive review, including her challenge to the state’s subject matter jurisdiction, where that state’s not of record court effectively terminated that parent’s parental rights and made de novo appeal of right effectively unavailable to her?

2) Is it a denial of a six-year-old German-American child’s rights, including the right to due process, equal protection and free speech, for a state to terminate all contact with her mother, without any evidentiary record or substantive de novo appellate review of right?

3) Is it a denial of the child’s basic human rights, as set forth under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, where the child is a German citizen, and the child is barred from any contact with her mother, without record or substantive de novo appellate review of right?

More on King v. Pfeiffer by going to, http://misconductinvirginiafamilycourts.blogspot.com/2009/11/dr-ariel-king-and-ariana-leilanis.html,

Or by sending mail to the little girl's mother,
DrArielKing@yahoo.com.

-Posted by VW on behalf of Ms. Ariel King

UPDATE 1.15.10
The Reply Brief and an Amicus Curiae have been filed. Click http://www.box.net/shared/og16jemoyc for brief, http://www.box.net/shared/cs68e6ihiq
for amicus curiae ("friend of the court") in support of brief.

_______
*From Mr. Lundy Bancroft, in
a Special Message for Protective Mothers:

There is no love deeper, more complete, and more vulnerable than the love that caring parents feel for their children. There is a bond so strong that it can be hard to tell exactly where the parent ends and the child begins, and the line is even harder to draw when our children are very young. Mothers have an additional bond from having carried their children inside of their bodies and having given birth to them, and more than half of mothers have experienced a deepened attachment through breast-feeding their babies. And mothers are, in the great majority of cases, their children’s primary caretakers, especially during their early years. All connections between caring, non-abusive parents and their children are so important as to be almost sacred, but there is usually a particular quality to the mother-child bond. That life-giving and sustaining connection deserves the full support and admiration of communities and nations.

And just as there is a special beauty and importance to relationships between mothers and their children, there is a special and extraordinary cruelty in the abusive man who attempts to break or weaken the mother-child bond, whether by turning children against their mother, by harming the children physically, sexually or psychologically, or by attempting to take custody of the children away from her.

Children need protection from their abusive parents. In the realm of custody litigation which involves abuse, the abusive parent tends to be the father while the protective parent is usually the mother, because most perpetrators of domestic violence and of child sexual abuse are male. We don’t know that much about what happens to protective fathers, since their cases are much less common, but we know that protective mothers frequently encounter a system that is insensitive, ignorant about the dynamics of abuse, and biased against women. In this context, mothers sometimes find themselves being forbidden by the court from protecting their children from a violent, cruel, or sexually abusive father. And this outcome is a tragic one, for children and for their mothers.

On behalf of the hundreds of people across the continent who are currently working for family court justice, I want to communicate to you our caring and solidarity with the challenging road you have ahead of you, as you fight to keep your children safe in body and soul. I want to let you know how critically important we believe that project to be, and how much your children need you to stand up for their rights and their well-being. You deserve admiration, not criticism, for the courageous risks you are taking on their behalf, and for your determination that all of you should have the opportunity to live in freedom and kindness…
[ SOURCE: ‘Child Custody Justice,’ a 10-part essay by L. Bancroft, http://www.lundybancroft.com/child.html ]
 

**Judges on the Virginia Courts in District & Circuit 17: Judge Esther Wiggins Lyles (!her term expires in 2011) and Judge George D. Varoutsos (!his term expires in 2010) for the Arlington Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court; Judge Dorothy H. Clarke, Judge Karen A. Henenberg, Judge Thomas J. Kelley and Judge Richard J. McCue for the Arlington General District Court; Judge William T. Newman, Judge James F. Almand, Judge Joanne F. Alper and Judge Benjamin N. A. Kendrick for the Arlington Circuit Court.

[This post was first published on 8 December 2009]